• 主題
高級搜索  >
歷史搜索 清空歷史
首頁> 外文學位 >Does intelligence oversight support or hinder counterinsurgency (COIN) and homeland defense operations?
【24h】

Does intelligence oversight support or hinder counterinsurgency (COIN) and homeland defense operations?

機譯：情報監督會支持還是阻礙反叛亂（COIN）和國土防御行動？

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例
頁面導航
  • 摘要
  • 著錄項
  • 相似文獻
  • 相關主題

摘要

This document begins with a description of the necessity of intelligence as a tool for fighting a counterinsurgency. From analyzing two theorists on the practice and theory of counterinsurgency it will become clear that the population is the key to countering the efforts of an insurgent force.;Standards of practice in obtaining intelligence are the means to maintaining an effective counterinsurgency. The established laws and guidelines for gathering intelligence will be studied. The evolution of intelligence gathering in the United States brings to light the necessity of laws and guidelines for gathering intelligence both within and outside our nation's borders. The laws developed serve to constrain the intelligence gathering agencies not restrain them. Constraints place limits of the method of gathering intelligence, while restraints keep agencies from gathering intelligence.;The current conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan serve as examples to exemplify the effects of improper intelligence gathering techniques. When intelligence oversight laws were set aside the insurgency gained strength. Once sound theories were placed into practice and intelligence oversight and international laws were followed the insurgence lost support; or rather the counterinsurgency gained support.;The function of gathering intelligence can be fulfilled within the civic and humanitarian laws in place. In fact, following international humanitarian laws enhances the credibility of action at home and abroad. Intelligence oversight laws do not place undue constraints on operators, but provide guidance in proven methods of supporting counterinsurgency and homeland operations
機譯：本文檔首先描述了情報作為對抗平叛力量的必要性。通過對平叛實踐和理論的兩位理論家的分析，可以清楚地看到，人口是抵抗起義部隊努力的關鍵。；獲取情報的實踐標準是維持有效的平叛手段。將研究已建立的收集情報的法律和準則。美國情報收集的發展揭示了在我國境內外收集情報的法律和準則的必要性。制定的法律旨在限制情報收集機構不加以限制。制約因素限制了情報收集方法的局限性，而制約因素則阻止了機構收集情報。；當前伊拉克和阿富汗的沖突是例證了情報收集技術不當所產生的影響。當情報監督法被擱置時，叛亂勢力得到加強。一旦將合理的理論付諸實踐，并遵循情報監督和國際法，叛亂就失去了支持?；蚋_切地說，平叛組織獲得了支持。情報收集的功能可以在現行的民事和人道主義法律范圍內完成。實際上，遵守國際人道主義法提高了國內外行動的信譽。情報監督法并沒有對運營商施加不適當的限制，但可以為支持平叛和國土作戰的行之有效的方法提供指導

著錄項

  • 作者

    Harris, Victor H.;

  • 作者單位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予單位 Georgetown University.;
  • 學科 Political Science International Law and Relations.;Military Studies.
  • 學位 M.A.L.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 頁碼 97 p.
  • 總頁數 97
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語種 eng
  • 中圖分類
  • 關鍵詞

  • 入庫時間 2022-08-17 11:36:59

相似文獻

  • 外文文獻
  • 中文文獻
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱：[email protected]

京公網安備：11010802029741號 ICP備案號：京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服務號

澳门三肖三码期期准精选反板块